Sunday, November 28, 2010

ives




A lineage of influence:     Ralph Waldo Emerson - Charles Ives - John Cage

My Jackson Pollock is Charles Ives.   Out there, revolutionary, misunderstood, cranky.

What is beautiful in music is too often confused
with letting our ears sit back in easy chairs.

Charles Ives




Monday, November 22, 2010

a book

As long as we're agreed that this IS may dribble over for a while?   Here is a book you really need to put your hands on.   I think you'll enjoy the way "Life Not Death in Venice" treats the arts and change.   And as promised below, I'll attempt to scan in the Geertz short piece that comes at the end.   Also there are essays on "performance" and "images" and how they "in experience" can be studied.   

Here's the note I wrote to Jim Lacey this morning and also posted in the Running and Doing Blog I maintain with Kurt.

 I got a really excellent book off my shelf last night (one that I think I've grown into over the last year).    It's a collection of essays edited  by Victor Turner and Edward Bruner.  And it has a short epilogue by Clifford Geertz:

The Anthropology of Experience. (1986).    Edited by Turner and Bruner.  UP of Illinois.  ISBN:  0252012496

I may scan in the Geertz eiplogue and send it to you and few other people.   It says a lot about how to get at the study of human experiences (leadership?).   Anyway, within it there's a really moving essay by Myerhoff about the studied dynamics of change in a retirement community of older European Jews living in Venice, CA.  Called "Life Not Death in Venice".   And then a really good essay making really fine connections to Thoreau, James and Dewey by Roger Abrahams called "Ordinary and Extraordinary Experience".   

----------

I will get into the Pollock materials on Tuesday.  

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

found objects

I rather like found object projects.   For years (being a runner and now a walker) along many roads....I have been interested in lost or discarded clothing.   But have never pursued it deliberately.  Although in my photo files I probably have (historically) a kind of assembly of photos.

I see each piece of clothing as a spur to the imagination.

Underwear of course is the most interesting since by being under wear it is more intimate.   Losing a baseball cap is not as intrinsically as interesting as a bra or boxers.   Or is that just me?

Where you find these things is interesting too.   Along a state highway is one thing.   But on a trail on a mountain is much more interesting.

For years I photographed a red scarf on a trail I hike every spring in Canada.  I think someone hung it on a tree branch, perhaps the owner would see it?  But they (perhaps) never did.  And it gradually rotted and faded on the branch.   On that same trail (but way off the trail where one might go to avoid a swampy area) I photographed a pair of mens Jordash jockey shorts draped over a bush.  After four years they had melted into the landscape.  Then this year, I found a really nice windbreaker under a picnic table on a remote point facing the Maine coast from the island I was on.   It was there most of the spring getting washed by nature and fading a bit.

There's a place on the Sandwich Notch Road where there's a red article of clothing embedded into the gravel road.  Who knows how old it could be?

It's the story with these things that's important.....how one connects them back to some version or vision of a possible reality.

Also thought a while about collecting the actual artifacts and collaging them.   Your piece here made me think of that.   But don't like to touch found underwear for some reason.   I don't think that's just me....

This approach to objects d'art  is I think the antithesis of zillion dollar classic paintings.